🔗 Share this article

I possess a few thoughts regarding that comments delivered by ESPN broadcaster a well-known announcer following Novak Djokovic's win over Taylor Fritz during the US Open quarter-finals. Consider – the athlete represents American, the commentator is from the US – and athletic competitions frequently lend themselves to nationalism. Some letdown was understandable. Rather, Fowler invoked the ongoing drought of US male players at grand slam tournaments: not one of them has won a trophy since the last American champion in 2003, and he had been the last one standing in the tournament.

We all enjoy a storyline, me too. But come on. Suppose the American had beaten Djokovic for the initial occasion, force of nature the Spanish star was looming in the next round, who Fritz has yet to beat in an competitive encounter. And if he’d someway survived that, it would have been title holder the Italian, against whom the American had lost 10 of the last 11 sets. Alcaraz and Sinner had also divided the last seven major titles (and the Spaniard proceeded to thrash a tired Serbian in the subsequent match). He stated in press after the loss that he in fact liked his path, because it presented the chance to defeat the three best players in the sport back-to-back. Fritz is well justified to aim for the achievement; an athlete is supposed to believe in themselves. But entering that Djokovic quarter-final who else in their right mind had the drought of American champions on the brain?

Coco Gauff’s second serve the sole barrier between her and sustained success

The American, twenty-eight, is ranked number four in the world entering the upcoming ATP World Tour Finals and has won his last six matches over third-ranked Alexander Zverev with increasing ease. Presumably he might claim that position for himself in the future. But evidently that at present, that is as far as he can climb: The Italian and Spaniard lie a vast gap of performance metrics away. Fritz’s top-class serve and powerful power on each forehand and reverse side are more than enough to defeat the majority of opponents on the professional circuit. When facing the select few generational talents, however, Fritz is often helpless. The last several seasons has witnessed the interesting emergence of lanky, towering players who can nevertheless move around with the surprising speed and fluidity of much shorter players. Fritz is 6ft 5ins and looks it. His movement is rigid, as if he hasn't fully adapted to his legs. So he’ll rarely steal a point that the opponent was dictating, and playing a soft shot versus him is typically a reliable tactic. That serves as a quite severe limitation on his potential.

The American has achieved a number of significant, unexpected improvements throughout his career. At the beginning of the ten-year period, he was circling the lower end of the top 30. 24 months later, he was sniffing the elite ten. Last year, he suddenly surged to fourth place – and held the position. But the subsequent step, competing against and beating all-time-greats like the young Spaniard, Sinner, and including a declining Djokovic, is the toughest of all. What could the commentator thinking? That the American, in 2025, was a serious threat to defeat them all back-to-back? That it was appropriate commenting on the ongoing drought of American men winning grand slams when he had departed the New York major in the quarter-finals? The thirst is just too much and the respect for the magnitude of the task insufficient.

Taylor Fritz achieved a personal best advancement to the All England Club last four in July.

The American's performance in that very quarter-final should have been sufficient of an indication. Djokovic triumphed in four rounds, a win that only seemed uncertain for brief periods towards the very end, when Fritz had survived a couple match points and had a chance to maintain serve for 5-5. The duo appeared well-balanced during the exchanges, with the American creating numerous opportunities to break. But Djokovic rescued service break opportunity after service break opportunity, prolonging the streak to the brink of agony. When Fritz eventually did claim one of the opportunities at 5-5 in the second set, he immediately played a horrendous service game to lose his own serve again; the Serbian had drawn him into a skirmish peripheral to the real battle and forced him to use far too much effort to win it. Down set points in the last game, his primary delivery sailed to the sky. He extended the match twice on his second serve, but finally committed two errors. It was not a choke, I didn’t think, just a consequence of needing to hit too many second serves.

The contest was fairly compelling evidence that Fritz is not good enough to beat any form of Djokovic, that was defeated by the Spaniard in the following match and never especially seem like he believed he could triumph. This is perfectly acceptable – Djokovic is the best player ever, and might not be at the height of his athletic abilities now, but has developed enough experience and strategic intelligence to compensate for a significant portion of the drop-off. The issue is those who were expecting Fritz to win, and pressuring him to achieve that, when he was yet to accomplished anything that suggested he could.

Fritz is an valuable contributor to the circuit nonetheless. He’s a patient, thoughtful voice in press conferences, more so than almost everyone on the men's tour except for the Russian star, prepared to not only say how he feels or the strategy he believed decided a contest, but explain it. That he should bear the brunt of the blame for America not produce a men's grand slam winner since the last American titlist seems unfair. (Now that the fellow American is competing alongside him in the rankings, maybe they can share that burden.)

Year-End Championships: Player Divisions

American legend Division

• Carlos Alcaraz (Sp)
• Taylor Fritz (US)
• Alex de Minaur (Aus)
• The Italian stylist

Swedish icon Group

• The Italian champion
• Alexander Zverev (Ger)
• Ben Shelton (US)
• Félix Auger-Aliassime (Can)

“I’d probably dwell on it forever if I don’t do it,” Fritz informed a journalist in the summer of winning a grand slam. It is hoped he understands that he’s not unsuccessful if he does not achieve that objective, that breaking through Alcaraz and Sinner’s dominant, formidable empire is actually extremely improbable for all other players. {