🔗 Share this article

Europe felt a moment of respite on Monday, as the crisis caused by the announcement of a new 28-article proposal for resolving the conflict appeared – briefly – to have been defused. A American diplomat spoke of "notable headway" after bilateral negotiations in Geneva. On Monday night, the Kremlin made its retaliation: an extensive attack of aerial bombardment on Kyiv.

The Pattern of Diplomacy and Destruction

The succession of contrasting events captured the harsh reality of the current period. By day, political struggles are fought: positive announcements are delivered from multiple capitals. Immense energy is devoted on restraining certain initiatives. By night, Moscow forcefully demonstrates the world that, for them, war remains the primary tool for achieving "settlement".

Nighttime Reality

As the offensive developed into the early hours of Tuesday, the current condition of Ukraine's vulnerability was laid bare. Ukraine is capable of detecting rocket firings from Russian territory, a capability enabled by current data. From observation points, military aircraft that had been deployed to engage hostile cruise missiles flew past – advanced fighter aircraft delivered to Ukraine by NATO members.

Shortly after, Kyiv's anti-aircraft weapons activated: several firings deployed against a incoming threat. This was a sophisticated defense system at work, probably supplied through allied countries. Every deployment creates sudden vibrations, causing tremors. The brief panic quickly becomes sober acceptance: perhaps the incoming missile won't strike its target this time, sparing the city from devastation and further power outages.

Continuous Dangers

Soon after, a large-caliber weapon opened up on a aerial vehicle close by, part of a defensive team – probably Western-made equipment. Unfortunately, the projectiles didn't strike the enemy aircraft – it continued its flight toward its destination.

Periodically, this continued until dawn. Kyiv faced the early updates: multiple fatalities, destruction and infrastructure problems in multiple buildings as a result of the evening attack. As typically, everyone still continued their routines – living the war. But those entire period encapsulated Ukraine's essential dependence on external assistance – a need that European nations are evidently unprepared to fill in the near term.

Ineffective Peace Efforts

The 28-point plan from American leadership generated strong feelings, debate and serious worry – and momentarily shifted focus from Ukraine's most significant graft case in years. Yet, we have witnessed similar scenarios, after previous diplomatic encounters and international summits.

Every new initiative from Washington follows the consistent cycle: a political offensive against Ukraine, which Kyiv, with partner nations, manages to fend off. They stabilise the situation but never actually achieve victory. This trend will, certainly, continue.

Tactical Assessments

It is convenient to criticize particular leaders of consistently pushing Russian terms. But that does not seem to be the entire situation. US administration functions according to a assumption well known to seasoned negotiators: you cannot secure via talks what you have failed to defend militarily. The American government presumes that it is unfeasible to pressure the Kremlin to surrender the territory that it presently holds in Ukraine's south or east.

The issue is that while recognising this factual reality, US leadership does nothing to prevent Kremlin actions, through words or deeds, from assuming that the status quo will not evolve additionally in its benefit in the near future.

Conflicting Perspectives

Therefore, Moscow is confident that the clock favors them – that Ukraine and its supporters are approaching exhaustion. Their motivation to accept conditions that does not give them the maximum possible gain is almost completely absent. There may be numerous efforts to stop fighting, but they will carry on as long as Russia's government remains highly assured in the conclusion.

On the contrary, Ukrainian leadership believes that Ukraine can still hold out, gradually sacrificing civilians and areas but averting a total frontline collapse until circumstances change in its benefit.

Current Realities

Objectively, there are no real preconditions for a truce. Now, individual motivations are coming into play: personal goals to broker a ceasefire and secure international recognition, and Ukrainian leadership's double obstacles – on one hand, not to distance important partners, and on the other, to rally Ukrainians around the country's interests against any proposal Kyiv finds unacceptable, so that their attention does not shift toward homefront challenges. And although their mission will now be considerably more difficult after latest incidents, it remains quite doubtful that this will alter their fundamental strategy.

These two forces are influencing discussions.

Summary and Prospects

It took a only one week to kill the 28 points of the current initiative. Assertive and inconsistent approach of the matter by American leadership, opposition by Ukraine and the other European countries, along with calming attempts of negotiators, and finally, recent disclosures, all achieved their purpose.

While new initiatives based on old ideas are approaching, Kyiv, London and other allied nations should arrive at a critical understanding: Ukraine and Europe will only be able to fend off political attacks from Washington that are founded on Moscow's terms and reflect specific hesitation to change the course of events, if they stand together and improve their protective measures at a considerably quicker tempo. If they do, no combination of diplomatic or military actions will be able to overcome them. In the meantime, Ukraine's capability to counter nocturnal attacks will, for the foreseeable future, mainly require sustained allied backing.